最烦凯拉韦，简直就是精英阶层一切讨人厌缺点的集大成者。看她的文章，永远是以精英一份子自居，对现今世界潮流的逆转，完全视而不见。

难道让人们回避事实，将尖锐矛盾披上一层模糊外衣的政治正确思维也适用于性别差异。西方的女权运动本来就存在巨大偏差，平等并非抹杀性别差异，反而是尊重性别差异，基于差异构建的和谐世界才是真正的性别平等。

看了FT这么多年，很多与国内主流不同的新的观点是在这里看到的。有时会有网页打不开，有时某篇文章看不到，常常在想，作为第二大经济体，为何不能更宽容多点胸怀接纳不同的观点。但是这篇文章的观点除外，吹毛求疵的圣母婊口吻，既不懂幽默，也没修养，想人为的制造热点，制造矛盾。

I support women's right but this went too far. The left cannot always assume every question asked to a women is whether you want to have sex.

More importantly, if you watch the interview, there was absolutely no showing of Becky Quick's reaction to Buffett's comment. You can hear a slight giggle instead. The writer conveniently altered the fact to make her fake anger sound more convincing. This is low, FT low.