@FT中文网【Facebook面临集体诉讼】用户指称,“游戏中广告”在自己不知情的情况下多次收费
2009年11月25日 07:00 AM

Facebook faces class-action suit over unauthorised game charges

背景
中文 评论 打印 电邮 收藏
 

Facebook has become entangled in a dispute over advertising practices after some of its users claimed they received un­authorised charges to their credit cards while playing games on the social networking site.

A class-action lawsuit filed last week accuses Facebook, the world's fourth-largest website, and Zynga, the largest social gaming company, of illegally charging users millions of dollars by getting them to sign up for recurring payments without their knowledge.

The Facebook dispute comes as US lawmakers are looking at other internet marketing practices that can result in un­expected charges for consumers. A technique known as “post-transaction marketing” – in which customers unwittingly sign up for offers that result in recurring credit card charges – is being investigated by a US Senate committee.

Within the social games played on Facebook, so-called “in-game offers” allow users to earn virtual currency by signing up for trials of anything from Netflix, the film rental service, to vitamin supplements. But the lawsuit alleges that in many cases, users are unknowingly authorising ongoing charges to their credit cards.

In one example from the suit, Zynga game player Rebecca Swift signed up for a “risk-free trial” of a green tea herbal supplement. The offer said users could cancel within 15 days and would only be charged $6 for shipping. But after trying to cancel, the user says she was billed $80 at first and another $86 two weeks later.

The suit was filed by Sacramento law firm Kershaw Cutter and Ratinoff on behalf of Facebook users, and accuses Zynga and Facebook of unfair competition and unjust enrichment.

In-game offers accounted for about a third of Zynga's estimated $250m 2009 revenues. The company said it has removed all offers from its games and will reintroduce them only once it can ensure their quality. It declined to comment on the lawsuit.

Facebook says it is not liable because the advertisements were hosted by an outside ad network, and that the ads violated its terms of service and should not have appeared.

大卫•盖尔斯上一篇文章:

社交网站改变阅读 2009-09-08

您可能感兴趣的文章:

漠视用户隐私的Facebook 2010-05-18
腾讯3亿美元投资俄罗斯同行DST 2010-04-13
Facebook防范网络性犯罪 2009-12-08
本文涉及话题:Facebook 社交网站

读者评论 评论只代表会员个人观点,不代表FT中文网观点

排序: 评论总数
正在加载评论内容......
[查看所有评论]
未经英国《金融时报》书面许可,对于英国《金融时报》拥有版权和/或其他知识产权的任何内容,任何人不得复制、转载、摘编或在非FT中文网(或:英国《金融时报》中文网)所属的服务器上做镜像或以其他任何方式进行使用。已经英国《金融时报》授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用。