想要获得最佳的阅读体验?免费下载FT中文网iPad应用程序,全球财经精粹尽在掌握!
@FT中文网【分析:反“国进民退”声浪见涨】中国商界和学术界一些名人正在就过去一年中一些经济领域出现的“再国有化”趋势,向政府施加更大的压力,警告说这可能会损害中国的长期增长前景。
2009年11月26日 14:33 PM

BEIJING ACCUSED OF ATTACKING PRIVATE ENTERPRISE

背景
中文 评论 打印 电邮 收藏
 

Beijing is facing a growing backlash from prominent figures in business and academia over claims that there has been creeping renationalisation in parts of the economy during the last year.

China's economy has recovered sharply in recent months as a result of an unprecedented expansion of government-directed bank lending, which has largely been channelled to state-owned enterprises.

However, critics say that the stimulus measures have also been accompanied by the state reasserting control over some sections of the economy, which could hurt the country's long-term growth prospects.

“Before the global economic crisis we still felt like we were moving continuously towards a more market-oriented and liberalised economy, but the government's stimulus programme has pushed that trend backwards,” Zhang Xin, chief executive of Soho China, one of the country's 10 largest property developers, told the Financial Times in an interview.

“We are seeing this in real estate but it is much worse in other industries where private players are being crushed.”

The dominance of state-owned enterprises is being reasserted in a range of industries, including airlines, steel and coal-mining at the expense of private ownership – a phenomenon that has been called guojin mintui, translated as “the state advances as the private sector recedes”.

Most of the country's privately owned airlines that were set up in recent years have been absorbed by loss-making state competitors in virtual hostile takeovers, while Rizhao Steel, a prominent private steel company, agreed to sell a majority stake to a state-owned rival under strong political pressure.

While Beijing has not advocated renationalisation as a goal, officials and businesspeople say the government's policies have had that effect, particularly since the onset of the global crisis last year.

“The state monopoly on market entry for many sectors is caused by the insufficient reform of our political system,” according to Liu Jipeng, professor at China University of Political Science and Law who helped draft China's state assets law.

Mr Liu said an important factor in the change of heart in Beijing on privatisation was the fear that China could see the rise of its own version of the Russian oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who was jailed in 2005 in what many observers saw as Kremlin retaliation for his growing involvement in politics.

The Chinese government has already taken some steps to try to defuse fears of a wave of nationalisations and has set up a group under Zhang Dejiang, vice-premier, to find ways to support small and medium-sized companies.

State media have reported the issue has been included among six main topics expected to be discussed in coming weeks by China's Communist leaders during their annual closed-door Economic Work Meeting, which sets the economic agenda for the forthcoming year.

In another sign of the complicated relationship between the Chinese state and private industry, the Communist party school in eastern Jiangsu province said earlier this year that it was launching a course specifically aimed at the children of successful private entrepreneurs.

The planned curriculum mixed financial and economic courses with instruction on party history and other political education. The course was to have started last month, but officials at the school said that it had been delayed.

吉密欧上一篇文章:

中国各银行将被迫筹集巨额新资本 2009-11-25

您可能感兴趣的文章:

中国《财富》500强企业富而不强 2011-07-08
委内瑞拉将向瑞士豪瑞赔偿6.5亿美金 2010-09-14
“国进民退”的分界线 2010-03-11
排序: 评论总数
[查看评论]
未经英国《金融时报》书面许可,对于英国《金融时报》拥有版权和/或其他知识产权的任何内容,任何人不得复制、转载、摘编或在非FT中文网(或:英国《金融时报》中文网)所属的服务器上做镜像或以其他任何方式进行使用。已经英国《金融时报》授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用。
就本文发表看法或联系编辑部,请电邮至 editor@ftchinese.com