想要获得最佳的阅读体验?免费下载FT中文网iPad应用程序,全球财经精粹尽在掌握!
@FT中文网【哥本哈根:谁赢谁输?】英国《金融时报》评出哥本哈根气候变化会议的三大赢家和三大输家。中国凭借高超的谈判技巧促成了一个最符合自身利益的协议,成为赢家之一。
2009年12月21日 15:26 PM

Winners and losers

背景
中文 评论 打印 电邮 收藏
 

WINNERSSceptics

Those who do not believe man-made carbon emissions are causing climate change are relishing Copenhagen's failure to deliver a concrete deal.

China

China demonstrated its formidable negotiating skills in bringing about an outcome that suits it better than any other nation.

Danish economy

The country has benefited from the spending by tens of thousands of participants.

LOSERSThe planet

The threat remains of catastrophic climate change caused by a global temperature rise.

Renewable energy companies

The lack of a binding commitment to promote green technology will reduce investors' appetite for long-term renewable energy projects.

Carbon traders

Copenhagen will not give carbon markets the boost that traders had wanted from a strong agreement.

克莱夫•库克森上一篇文章:

金融模型向何处去? 2009-12-03

菲奥娜•哈维上一篇文章:

《哥本哈根协议》不足以让地球摆脱危险 2009-12-21

您可能感兴趣的文章:

FT社评:气候研究亟需变革 2010-09-03
科学研究证实气候变化“不容否认” 2010-07-29
分析:哥本哈根之后,中国如何谋局? 2009-12-22
排序: 评论总数
[查看评论]
未经英国《金融时报》书面许可,对于英国《金融时报》拥有版权和/或其他知识产权的任何内容,任何人不得复制、转载、摘编或在非FT中文网(或:英国《金融时报》中文网)所属的服务器上做镜像或以其他任何方式进行使用。已经英国《金融时报》授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用。
就本文发表看法或联系编辑部,请电邮至 editor@ftchinese.com