【分析:诺贝尔和平奖冲击波】许多人会质疑,通过让北京难堪来推动政治改革,并不是诺贝尔奖委员会的职责。而中国政府的第一反应,是将此描述为中国与西方之间的冲突。
2010年10月11日 07:31 AM

The state loudly lambasts the west while citizens quietly give thanks

背景
中文 评论 打印 电邮 收藏
 

“The [Chinese] people’s wishes for and needs for democracy and freedom are irresistible.” Fighting words, indeed. They could quite easily have come from Liu Xiaobo, the Chinese activist serving an 11-year prison sentence for subversion who was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday in recognition of his long record of calling for gradual political change. Instead, they were spoken by Wen Jiabao, China’s premier, in an interview he gave last week to CNN before the Nobel announcement.

China’s economic success has been so dramatic and sustained that it can feel as if the big political questions about how the country should be governed, which came to a head in Tiananmen Square two decades ago, have simply faded into irrelevance. Yet Mr Wen’s remarks show that debates about Chinese political reform do not take place only in Oslo – even some of the country’s senior leaders admit there is unfinished business.

Certainly, many will question whether it is the Nobel committee’s job to promote political change by embarrassing Beijing. For the Chinese authorities, the immediate instinct is to make this a straight conflict between China and the west, which wants to slow its rise. “The Nobel Peace Prize has been reduced to a political tool of western interests,” the Global Times, a tabloid with close connections to the Communist party, thundered over the weekend. “What they’re doing now is using the Peace Prize to tear a hole in Chinese society.”

And it is not just overt nationalists who will resent the outside interference. There are plenty of educated Chinese who feel that the country does not get enough credit for its economic progress or the very real expansion in personal freedoms over the past 30 years.

There is also a certain amount of trepidation about how the regime will respond. Celebration banquets in Beijing were broken up by the police with supporters of Mr Liu temporarily detained. China has a plethora of non-governmental organisations in areas such as the environment, which have won space to operate in recent years and often adopt an almost radical pragmatism when it comes to politics, sticking strictly within the limits of the possible. Many will fear a backlash from a wounded Beijing and maybe resent the provocation that the prize represents.

Yet the Nobel for Mr Liu could also have all sorts of powerful ripple effects in a fast-changing society. China might not be seething with people who openly support multi-party elections and who want to see the Communist party swept from power but growing sections of society believe strongly in freedoms of the press, of assembly and of protest – the very rights notionally protected in the Chinese constitution that the Nobel Prize committee highlighted. And they expect the Communist party to honour more of those rights.

Jailed for 11 years for organising a pro-democracy petition, Mr Liu is a standard-bearer for political reform but in many ways he is not the main challenge for the authorities. A writer-intellectual in the mould of Vaclav Havel, the former Czech president who nominated him for the Nobel, Mr Liu is part of an older generation of dissidents who have been marginalised since Tiananmen. Few ordinary Chinese have heard of him.

Instead, the pressure is more diffuse but from a broader range of sources. There are the well-to-do suburban residents who happily organise large protests when their property rights are affected and make sure television cameras are there to watch them. China’s fast-growing legal community is full of people – from judges to citizens with a grievance – who are trying to build more independent courts.

And then there is the internet, which, in spite of all the efforts of the authorities to censor and mould discussion, is also a deep well of rebellious irony. One of the more commented online subjects over the past week has been Mr Wen’s CNN interview and the fact that it was barely covered in the mainstream media.

The Chinese party-state is such a blizzard of activity, that it is often easy to overlook the increasingly vibrant society emerging from behind its Leninist shadow. Many members of this new society spent the weekend quietly thanking the Nobel committee for its show of support.

相关文章

北京称诺贝尔和平奖典礼是“政治闹剧” 2010-12-13
“诺贝尔和平奖并非针对中国” 2010-12-10
19国将缺席诺贝尔和平奖颁奖仪式 2010-12-08
两套话语的矛盾 2010-11-02
FT社评:中国政改新动力 2010-10-14
中国取消会晤挪威渔业大臣 2010-10-13
今年诺贝尔经济学奖由三位学者共享 2010-10-12
授奖之后 2010-10-11
中国异见人士获诺贝尔和平奖 2010-10-09
奥巴马获诺贝尔和平奖引发争议 2009-10-10

杰夫•代尔上一篇文章

中国异见人士获诺贝尔和平奖 2010-10-09
本文涉及话题诺贝尔奖

分享本文

排序: 评论总数
[查看评论]
未经英国《金融时报》书面许可,对于英国《金融时报》拥有版权和/或其他知识产权的任何内容,任何人不得复制、转载、摘编或在非FT中文网(或:英国《金融时报》中文网)所属的服务器上做镜像或以其他任何方式进行使用。已经英国《金融时报》授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用。