EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU carmakers’ strategic U-turns point them in the right direction

The wheels have not come off the electronic vehicle market entirely

When periods of exuberance come to a close, ideas that once seemed to make a lot of sense no longer do. So it is in the European car industry. Slowing growth of electric vehicle sales has caused a series of corporate U-turns. While sharp swerves are never fun, the change in direction is sensible.

A decision by Volvo Cars on Thursday to cut loose its premium EV brand Polestar is the latest example of a strategic about-turn. Earlier this week, Renault axed plans to float its EV unit Ampere. A mooted initial public offering of Volkswagen’s battery unit, meanwhile, also looks some way off.

The wheels have not come off the EV market entirely. Sales growth in Europe is expected to come in at about 5 per cent in 2024 — a sharp slowdown from 2023’s 14 per cent growth, but hardly a crash. The market had simply overestimated the pace of change.

EU carmakers, traditionally plagued with vast conglomerate discounts, aimed to attract sky high valuations for their EV arms. The hope was to achieve those enjoyed by Tesla, which trades at more than 58 times forward earnings, and Vietnam’s VinFast. Now that the market’s enthusiasm has waned — shares in VinFast are down 85 per cent over the past six months — “unlocking value” through corporate action looks less attractive.   

The strategic rationale for EV listings was always tenuous. Polestar, with sizeable investment needs and operationally reliant on Volvo and its Chinese parent Geely, was not an obvious candidate for a standalone equity story when it listed in 2022. Worse, Volvo retained 48 per cent. With the Swedish carmaker facing big EV-related capex needs of its own, a spin-off that hands Polestar to its ultimate shareholder Geely looks like a better plan. Volvo’s stock rose by about a quarter on Thursday. 

At Renault, too, shareholders welcomed the decision to keep Ampere within the fold. Lex has argued that EVs will be a key pillar of the group’s value creation in future. But given Renault does not need capital to fund its transition, it is right to hold on to Ampere for the time being.

The slowing pace of EV adoption is good news for traditional European automakers, which have been slow to transition. Stellantis, which has taken a particularly cautious approach, has outperformed Tesla in the past 12 months. If the EV revolution takes longer to materialise legacy automakers should have more time to align themselves with their EV-focused peers.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

员工幸福感越高,公司估值越高?

研究发现,盈利能力更强、股市表现更好的公司,员工的幸福感、使命感和工作满意度往往更高。

冯德莱恩支持将欧盟预算与经济改革挂钩

欧盟委员会主席寻求复制疫后复苏基金的“成功”。

英伟达的竞争对手力图打破其“Cuda”平台的垄断地位

OpenAI牵头推动“Cuda”替代方案的开发,力图打破这家芯片制造商对人工智能市场的垄断。

制裁对伊朗直升机造成了怎样的破坏

由于西方国家的制裁,伊朗一直无法更新其机队,在此次坠机事件中的坠毁美制贝尔212已服役近30年。

生活成本危机下澳大利亚推出租金补贴和能源退税

这场危机将澳大利亚划分为房主和租房者,中左翼工党政府正试图在明年大选前提振中低收入者的收入。

Lex专栏:《体育画报》揭示的品牌货币化陷阱

也许收购能够让这些珍爱的品牌生存下去,但也可能让它面目全非。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×